抽象的な

Public credibility evaluation of scientific and technological organizations based on analytic hierarchy process

Tian Si


To evaluate the public credibility of scientific and technological organizations (taking Zhejiang Province China as an example), the evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was constructed. Qualified organizations were screened in 4 aspects: organization administration and capacity building, infrastructures, business activities and performance, and social impact. An evaluation indicator system was constructed with 16 evaluation indicators, covering the qualities of information transparency, organization institution, technical service, and evaluation by government and business administration authorities. The comprehensive evaluation was performed by means of AHP and using the established evaluation indicator system. The results showed that the focus of improving the public credibility of scientific and technological organizations in Zhejiang Province lies in improving institution, information transparency, technical service and training, and evaluation from government and business administration authorities. Moreover, some countermeasures are proposed


免責事項: この要約は人工知能ツールを使用して翻訳されており、まだレビューまたは確認されていません

インデックス付き

  • キャス
  • Google スカラー
  • Jゲートを開く
  • 中国国家知識基盤 (CNKI)
  • サイテファクター
  • コスモスIF
  • 研究ジャーナル索引作成ディレクトリ (DRJI)
  • 秘密検索エンジン研究所
  • 学術論文インパクトファクター (SAJI))
  • ICMJE

もっと見る

ジャーナルISSN

ジャーナル h-インデックス

Flyer

オープンアクセスジャーナル